#systematic review

systematic review

3 papers

Review2025

Technology-enhanced content and language integrated learning: A systematic review of empirical studies

Dongpin Hu, Juanjuan Chen, Yan Li, Minhong Wang

Educational Research Review

A systematic review of 20 SSCI journal articles maps seven technology types in CLIL and finds limited, uncertain evidence for gains in content knowledge and language achievement.

systematic reviewCLILtechnology-enhanced language learning

Read 500-word summary →

A racially diverse university language class evaluates AI-supported writing, speaking, translation and feedback activities with an instructor

Review2026

Review 78

A review of 101 higher-education English-language studies maps five roles for AI and recurring evidence gaps

Yanping Wang, Zuwati Hasim, Ling Wu, Yujia Fang

Cogent Education

A systematic review retained 101 empirical studies of AI in higher-education ESL and EFL from 1,536 records. It identified five broad roles for AI and generally positive reports, while finding regional and skill imbalances, uneven methods, overreliance risks and limited evidence about culture, equity and durable outcomes.

AI in educationEnglish language teachingsystematic review

Read 500-word summary →

A diverse mathematics class works with an AI tutoring system while a teacher compares student reasoning and assessment evidence

Review2026

Review 74

Review of 12 studies finds promising mathematics-tutoring gains while generative-AI achievement evidence remains thin

Neo Molemane, Moeketsi Mosia, Felix O. Egara

Discover Education

A PRISMA systematic review screened 1,749 records and included 12 studies of AI tutoring and assessment in mathematics. Results were generally promising, especially for some lower-performing learners, but heterogeneous methods and limited direct achievement evidence for generative AI prevent a universal efficacy claim.

AI tutoringmathematics educationautomated assessment

Read 500-word summary →